Skip to main content
    Back to Archive
    Blog Post2015

    Teaching Leaders What to Stop: Playing Favorites

    Share

    The Leader's Behavioral Challenge

    The higher you climb in an organization, the more your professional challenges become behavioral. While your technical skills and industry knowledge are established, success is increasingly hindered by a lack of interpersonal skills. Most leadership frameworks value behaviors like developing people and valuing diverse opinions, yet many leaders fall into a common trap: playing favorites.

    The "Suck-Up" dynamic

    Many leaders believe they are immune to flattery, but it's easy to see this behavior in others while missing it in ourselves. We may inadvertently send signals encouraging praise and discouraging criticism. But how can you be sure you aren't unconsciously rewarding the wrong behaviors?

    The Dog Analogy

    Consider this test, conducted with thousands of executives. When asked who gets the most enthusiastic greeting when they get home—a spouse, kids, or the dog—more than 80% admit it's the dog. The reason is simple: the dog is always happy to see them, offers unconditional affection, and never talks back. In other words, the dog is a "suck-up."

    If we are not careful, we can treat our employees the same way, rewarding those who heap unthinking admiration upon us. This presents two significant problems:

    1. Neglects actual work: If everyone is focused on flattering the leader, who is focused on results?
    2. Favors the wrong people: If productive work is being done, you are likely rewarding the flatterers instead of the contributors.

    A 4-Step Test to Identify Favoritism

    To combat this tendency, leaders must first admit they have it. Then, you can perform a self-analysis by ranking your direct reports in four categories:

    1. How much do they like me?
    2. How much are they like me?
    3. What is their contribution to the company and its customers?
    4. How much positive personal recognition do I give them?

    After ranking your reports, analyze the results. Is the correlation stronger between your recognition (4) and their contribution (3), or is it more closely linked to how much they like you or are like you (1 and 2)?

    If your recognition is tied more to affinity than performance, you are playing favorites. This quick self-analysis won't solve the problem on its own, but it is the essential first step. Identifying the issue is where meaningful change begins.

    Frequently asked questions

    Share this articleLinkedInXFacebookRedditWhatsAppEmail

    Best Practice Institute

    Best Practice Institute is the research organization behind Most Loved Workplace® certification, the SPARK Model, the Love of Workplace Index™ (LOWI™), and The Workplace Report.

    The Workplace Report

    The Workplace Report is BPI's original workplace culture research and editorial briefing series for CEOs, CHROs, people leaders, talent leaders, and employer-brand teams. It turns BPI's 25 years of research, Most Loved Workplace® certification data, SPARK findings, and current workforce signals into practical analysis leaders can use.

    The report format includes executive summaries, research-backed articles, company examples, methodology notes, and practical implications for retention, hiring, culture, leadership, and employee experience. New research and analysis is published on an ongoing editorial cadence at /workplace-report.